linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8996: Fix parent for CLKREF clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191226222315.GD1908628@ripper>
Date:   Thu, 26 Dec 2019 14:23:15 -0800
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Pisati <p.pisati@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8996: Fix parent for CLKREF clocks

On Mon 23 Dec 18:48 PST 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-12-07 12:36:02)
> > The CLKREF clocks are all fed by the clock signal on the CXO2 pad on the
> > SoC. Update the definition of these clocks to allow this to be wired up
> > to the appropriate clock source.
> > 
> > Retain "xo" as the global named parent to make the change a nop in the
> > event that DT doesn't carry the necessary clocks definition.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml   |  6 ++--
> >  drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c                | 35 +++++++++++++++----
> >  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> What is this patch based on? I think I'm missing some sort of 8996 yaml
> gcc binding patch.
> 

The patch applies cleanly on linux-next and afaict it depends on the
yamlification done in 9de7269e9703 ("dt-bindings: clock: Add YAML
schemas for the QCOM GCC clock bindings"), which git tells me is
included in v5.5-rc1 as well.

Am I misunderstanding your question?

Regards,
Bjorn