[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191226.150941.618022568387879445.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:09:41 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: po.liu@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
vinicius.gomes@...el.com, claudiu.manoil@....com,
vladimir.oltean@....com, alexandru.marginean@....com,
xiaoliang.yang_1@....com, roy.zang@....com, mingkai.hu@....com,
jerry.huang@....com, leoyang.li@....com, ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [net-next] enetc: add support time specific departure base on
the qos etf
From: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 03:42:39 +0000
> - Transmit checksum offloads and time specific departure operation
> are mutually exclusive.
I do not see anything which enforces this conflict.
It looks to me like if the user configures time specific departure,
and TX SKBs will be checksum offloaded, the time specific departure
will simply not be performed.
If true, this behavior will be very surprising for the user.
Instead, the configuration operation that creates the conflict should
throw and error and fail.
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists