linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 28 Dec 2019 07:39:59 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jaedon Shin <jaedon.shin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the block tree

Hi Jens,

On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:29:40 -0700 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> On 12/27/19 1:27 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 12/27/2019 11:55 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
> >>
> >> In commit
> >>
> >>   1a3d78cb6e20 ("ata: ahci_brcm: BCM7425 AHCI requires AHCI_HFLAG_DELAY_ENGINE")
> >>
> >> Fixes tags
> >>
> >>   Fixes: 9586114cf1e9 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support MIPS-based platforms")
> >>   Fixes: 423be77daabe ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add quirk for broken ncq")
> >>
> >> have this problem:
> >>
> >>   - Target SHA1s do not exist
> >>
> >> Perhaps you meant
> >>
> >> Fixes: 1980eb9bd7d7 ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: add support for MIPS-based platforms")
> >> Fixes: 7de3244530bf ("ata: ahci_brcmstb: disable NCQ for MIPS-based platforms")  
> > 
> > Yes, those are the two that should have been used, the two commits were
> > extracted from a downstream tree where the upstream commits ended up
> > looking slightly different, my script does not (yet) rewrite those, Jens
> > would you want me to resubmit or can you rewrite the commit message in
> > place?  
> 
> It's too late unfortunately, Linus already pulled it. So we'll have to
> live with it, at least the commit titles are correct so it should be
> manageable.

Unfortunately, even the titles are not correct, so they took me a
little time to find the correct commits :-(  This means it will also
take the stable maintainers a bit of time.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped