lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38acf5fc-85aa-7090-e666-97a1281e9905@free.fr>
Date:   Sat, 28 Dec 2019 16:41:08 +0100
From:   Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>
To:     Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: qcom: Fix the fixup of PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM

On 27/12/2019 09:51, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:

> On 12/27/19 3:27 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>
>> There exists non-bridge PCIe devices with PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, so limit
>> the fixup to only affect the relevant PCIe bridges.
>>
>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Stan, I picked up all the suggested device id's from the previous thread and
>> added 0x1000 for QCS404. I looked at creating platform specific defines in
>> pci_ids.h, but SDM845 has both 106 and 107... Please let me know if you would
>> prefer that I do this anyway.
> 
> Looks good,
> 
> Acked-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
> 
>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 8 +++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>> index 5ea527a6bd9f..138e1a2d21cc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
>> @@ -1439,7 +1439,13 @@ static void qcom_fixup_class(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  {
>>  	dev->class = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI << 8;
>>  }
>> -DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, PCI_ANY_ID, qcom_fixup_class);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x0101, qcom_fixup_class);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x0104, qcom_fixup_class);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x0106, qcom_fixup_class);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x0107, qcom_fixup_class);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x0302, qcom_fixup_class);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x1000, qcom_fixup_class);
>> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_QCOM, 0x1001, qcom_fixup_class);

Hrmmm... still not CCed on the patch, and still don't think the
fixup is required(?) for 0x106 and 0x107.

Regards.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ