[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4i_frm8jZeknniPexp8AAmGsaq0_DHegmL4XZHQi1ThxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 09:17:49 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christian Bundy <christianbundy@...ction.io>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
stable-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch "tpm_tis: reserve chip for duration of tpm_tis_core_init"
has been added to the 5.4-stable tree
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:15 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 08:11:50AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Dan, please also test the branch and tell if other patches are needed.
> > I'm a bit blind with this as I don't have direct access to the faulting
> > hardware. Thanks. [*]
> >
> > [*] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/27/12
>
> Given that:
>
> 1. I cannot reproduce the bug locally.
> 2. Neither of the patches have any appropriate tags (tested-by and
> reviewed-by). [*]
>
> I'm sorry but how am I expected to include these patches?
Thanks for the branch, I'll get it tested on the failing hardware.
Might be a few days due to holiday lag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists