[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191228181825.GB6746@cisco>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 11:18:25 -0700
From: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
To: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
jannh@...gle.com, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
keescook@...omium.org, cyphar@...har.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] samples, selftests/seccomp: Zero out seccomp_notif
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:48:39AM +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> The seccomp_notif structure should be zeroed out prior to calling the
> SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV ioctl. Previously, the kernel did not check
> whether these structures were zeroed out or not, so these worked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> samples/seccomp/user-trap.c | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c
> index 6d0125ca8af7..0ca8fb37cd79 100644
> --- a/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c
> +++ b/samples/seccomp/user-trap.c
> @@ -298,7 +298,6 @@ int main(void)
> req = malloc(sizes.seccomp_notif);
> if (!req)
> goto out_close;
> - memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req));
>
> resp = malloc(sizes.seccomp_notif_resp);
> if (!resp)
> @@ -306,6 +305,7 @@ int main(void)
> memset(resp, 0, sizeof(*resp));
I know it's unrelated, but it's probably worth sending a patch to fix
this to be sizes.seccomp_notif_resp instead of sizeof(*resp), since if
the kernel is older this will over-zero things. I can do that, or you
can add the patch to this series, just let me know which.
But in any case, this patch is:
Reviewed-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
Cheers,
Tycho
Powered by blists - more mailing lists