linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 03/17] soundwire: rename drv_to_sdw_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e5b45832-6a7e-1538-8069-ef366b87a8b7@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Dec 2019 17:23:42 -0600
From:   Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
        Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5 03/17] soundwire: rename
 drv_to_sdw_slave_driver macro



On 12/27/19 1:00 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 17-12-19, 15:03, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> Align with previous renames and shorten macro
>>
>> No functionality change
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c       | 9 ++++-----
>>   include/linux/soundwire/sdw_type.h | 3 ++-
>>   2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c
>> index c0585bcc8a41..2b2830b622fa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus_type.c
>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ sdw_get_device_id(struct sdw_slave *slave, struct sdw_driver *drv)
>>   static int sdw_bus_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *ddrv)
>>   {
>>   	struct sdw_slave *slave = to_sdw_slave_device(dev);
>> -	struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_slave_driver(ddrv);
>> +	struct sdw_driver *drv = to_sdw_slave_driver(ddrv);
> 
> so patch 1 does:
> 
> -       struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_driver(dev->driver);
> +       struct sdw_driver *drv = drv_to_sdw_slave_driver(dev->driver);
> 
> and here we move drv_to_sdw_slave_driver to to_sdw_slave_driver... why
> not do this in first patch and save step1... or did i miss something??

because patch1 introduces replaces 'sdw_' by 'sdw_slave_' in several 
places, not just for drv_to_sdw_driver()

I can squash all these patches if you want to but then you'll tell me 
one step at a time...