[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191229172724.486261658@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:26:32 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 339/434] ASoC: soc-pcm: check symmetry before hw_params
From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
[ Upstream commit 5cca59516de5df9de6bdecb328dd55fb5bcccb41 ]
This reverts commit 957ce0c6b8a1f (ASoC: soc-pcm: check symmetry after
hw_params).
That commit cause soc_pcm_params_symmetry can't take effect.
cpu_dai->rate, cpu_dai->channels and cpu_dai->sample_bits
are updated in the middle of soc_pcm_hw_params, so move
soc_pcm_params_symmetry to the end of soc_pcm_hw_params is
not a good solution, for judgement of symmetry in the function
is always true.
FIXME:
According to the comments of that commit, I think the case
described in the commit should disable symmetric_rates
in Back-End, rather than changing the position of
soc_pcm_params_symmetry.
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1573555602-5403-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index cdce96a3051b..a6e96cf1d8ff 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -877,6 +877,11 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
int i, ret = 0;
mutex_lock_nested(&rtd->card->pcm_mutex, rtd->card->pcm_subclass);
+
+ ret = soc_pcm_params_symmetry(substream, params);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
if (rtd->dai_link->ops->hw_params) {
ret = rtd->dai_link->ops->hw_params(substream, params);
if (ret < 0) {
@@ -958,9 +963,6 @@ static int soc_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
}
component = NULL;
- ret = soc_pcm_params_symmetry(substream, params);
- if (ret)
- goto component_err;
out:
mutex_unlock(&rtd->card->pcm_mutex);
return ret;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists