[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191229172728.441663267@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:27:26 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 393/434] efi/memreserve: Register reservations as reserved in /proc/iomem
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
commit ab0eb16205b43ece4c78e2259e681ff3d645ea66 upstream.
Memory regions that are reserved using efi_mem_reserve_persistent()
are recorded in a special EFI config table which survives kexec,
allowing the incoming kernel to honour them as well. However,
such reservations are not visible in /proc/iomem, and so the kexec
tools that load the incoming kernel and its initrd into memory may
overwrite these reserved regions before the incoming kernel has a
chance to reserve them from further use.
Address this problem by adding these reservations to /proc/iomem as
they are created. Note that reservations that are inherited from a
previous kernel are memblock_reserve()'d early on, so they are already
visible in /proc/iomem.
Tested-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@...fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191206165542.31469-2-ardb@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
@@ -970,6 +970,24 @@ static int __init efi_memreserve_map_roo
return 0;
}
+static int efi_mem_reserve_iomem(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
+{
+ struct resource *res, *parent;
+
+ res = kzalloc(sizeof(struct resource), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!res)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ res->name = "reserved";
+ res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
+ res->start = addr;
+ res->end = addr + size - 1;
+
+ /* we expect a conflict with a 'System RAM' region */
+ parent = request_resource_conflict(&iomem_resource, res);
+ return parent ? request_resource(parent, res) : 0;
+}
+
int __ref efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phys_addr_t addr, u64 size)
{
struct linux_efi_memreserve *rsv;
@@ -994,7 +1012,7 @@ int __ref efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phy
rsv->entry[index].size = size;
memunmap(rsv);
- return 0;
+ return efi_mem_reserve_iomem(addr, size);
}
memunmap(rsv);
}
@@ -1004,6 +1022,12 @@ int __ref efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phy
if (!rsv)
return -ENOMEM;
+ rc = efi_mem_reserve_iomem(__pa(rsv), SZ_4K);
+ if (rc) {
+ free_page((unsigned long)rsv);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
/*
* The memremap() call above assumes that a linux_efi_memreserve entry
* never crosses a page boundary, so let's ensure that this remains true
@@ -1020,7 +1044,7 @@ int __ref efi_mem_reserve_persistent(phy
efi_memreserve_root->next = __pa(rsv);
spin_unlock(&efi_mem_reserve_persistent_lock);
- return 0;
+ return efi_mem_reserve_iomem(addr, size);
}
static int __init efi_memreserve_root_init(void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists