[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191229172703.929761617@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:21:21 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 028/434] btrfs: dont double lock the subvol_sem for rename exchange
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
commit 943eb3bf25f4a7b745dd799e031be276aa104d82 upstream.
If we're rename exchanging two subvols we'll try to lock this lock
twice, which is bad. Just lock once if either of the ino's are subvols.
Fixes: cdd1fedf8261 ("btrfs: add support for RENAME_EXCHANGE and RENAME_WHITEOUT")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -9535,9 +9535,8 @@ static int btrfs_rename_exchange(struct
btrfs_init_log_ctx(&ctx_dest, new_inode);
/* close the race window with snapshot create/destroy ioctl */
- if (old_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
- down_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
- if (new_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
+ if (old_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID ||
+ new_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
down_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
/*
@@ -9771,9 +9770,8 @@ out_fail:
ret = ret ? ret : ret2;
}
out_notrans:
- if (new_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
- up_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
- if (old_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
+ if (new_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID ||
+ old_ino == BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID)
up_read(&fs_info->subvol_sem);
ASSERT(list_empty(&ctx_root.list));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists