[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9q7ZG83Odh1-NkRcKp836tCRaVj1R9TGp_L_nr0Rh9r5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:10:02 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mips: vdso: conditionalize 32-bit time functions on COMPAT_32BIT_TIME
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:37 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 1:34 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > - Why does it crash in the first place rather than returning -ENOSYS?
>
> There's a bit of speculation about this in the original thread that
> prompted this patch (you're CC'd).
The following will provoke the crash:
__attribute__((noinline)) void somefunc(void) { }
int __clock_gettime(clockid_t clk, struct timespec *ts)
{
((int (*)(clockid_t, struct timespec *))vdso_func)(clk, ts);
somefunc();
return 88;
}
It seems like the VDSO is doing something to the stack.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists