[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191230173430.GA1350143@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:34:30 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/161] 4.14.161-stable review
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 09:12:20AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 06:17:28PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.161 release.
> > There are 161 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:17:25 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> Build results:
> total: 172 pass: 170 fail: 2
> Failed builds:
> i386:tools/perf
> x86_64:tools/perf
> Qemu test results:
> total: 373 pass: 373 fail: 0
>
> util/probe-finder.c: In function ‘probe_point_inline_cb’:
> util/dwarf-aux.c: In function ‘__die_walk_funclines_cb’:
> util/probe-finder.c:971:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘die_entrypc’; did you mean ‘dwarf_entrypc’?
Should now be fixed, will go push out a -rc2 with the resolution.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists