linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/434] 5.4.7-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:08:49 -0600
From:   Dan Rue <dan.rue@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/434] 5.4.7-stable review

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 06:45:22PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 10:34:37AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 06:20:53PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.7 release.
> > > There are 434 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > 
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
> 
> Thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.
> 
> But didn't you add perf build testing to your builds?  That should have
> broken things, so I am guessing not :(

We do build (and run) perf, and it worked for us. Which patch was the
problem? I can go look at why our config didn't hit the offending
code/build path.

Dan

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org