linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/219] 4.19.92-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191231160519.GB11542@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 31 Dec 2019 08:05:19 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/219] 4.19.92-stable review

On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 06:16:42PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.92 release.
> There are 219 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:17:25 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

For -rc2:

Build results:
	total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 381 pass: 376 fail: 5
Failed tests:
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:initrd
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:ide:rootfs
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:sdhci:mmc:rootfs
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:nvme:rootfs
	ppc64:mac99:ppc64_book3s_defconfig:smp:scsi[DC395]:rootfs

Bug-for-bug compatible with mainline. That makes me wonder if I should
stop testing those ppc images instead of being annoyed by the failures.
Thoughts ?

Guenter