[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef2785ae-5205-9840-e0b1-3ab920b35482@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:15:05 -0300
From: "Daniel W. S. Almeida" <dwlsalmeida@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] Documentation: nfsroot.txt: convert to ReST
> Changing text in an existing paragraph can
> result in line lengths that are inconsistent and ragged, leading to a less
> pleasant appearance
> and the temptation to "refill" the paragraph so that the
> lines are all approximately equal in length. The problem with yielding
> to that temptation is that it messes up
> the diff output so that you can no longer easily see the actual
> text changes that were made.
>
> Thus, when making such changes, it can be better to not refill the
> paragraphs - as, indeed, you did not. But if the result becomes too
> difficult to read (as in, it creates lines that are waaaay to long), it
> can be good to create a second patch that makes only the cosmetic changes
> without any associated text changes. I was suggesting doing that in this
> case.
> Does that help?
Yes, that's better!
Thank you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists