linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: set device as default active power mode during initialization only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <836772092daffd8283a97d633e59fc34@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 31 Dec 2019 10:13:27 +0800
From:   Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     asutoshd@...eaurora.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, avri.altman@....com,
        alim.akhtar@...sung.com, pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com,
        jejb@...ux.ibm.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com, bvanassche@....org,
        subhashj@...eaurora.org, beanhuo@...ron.com,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
        chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: set device as default active power mode
 during initialization only

On 2019-12-31 09:07, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Hi Asutosh,
> 
> 
>> I see that there's a get_sync done before.
>> So, how would the suspend be triggered in that case?
>> 
> 
> Would you mean pm_runtime_get_sync() in ufshcd_init()?
> If yes, it will only happen during initialization.
> 
> The runtime resume path may go through ufshcd_probe_hba() without
> ufshcd_init() invoked before, for example,
> 
> ufshcd_probe_hba+0xe10/0x1874
> ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore+0x114/0x1a4
> ufshcd_resume+0x1d0/0x480
> ufshcd_runtime_resume+0x40/0x188
> ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_resume+0x10/0x18
> pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x24/0x44
> __rpm_callback+0x100/0x250
> rpm_resume+0x548/0x7c8
> rpm_resume+0x2b4/0x7c8
> rpm_resume+0x2b4/0x7c8
> rpm_resume+0x2b4/0x7c8
> pm_runtime_work+0x9c/0xa0
> process_one_work+0x210/0x4e0
> worker_thread+0x390/0x520
> kthread+0x154/0x18c
> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
> 
> This case happens if link is in "off" state while resume.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stanley

Hi Stanley,

I see skipping ufshcd_set_ufs_dev_active() in ufshcd_probe_hba()
if it is called from ufshcd_resume() path is the purpose here.

If so, then ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode() would be called, meaning
SSU command will be sent. Why is this SSU command needed to be
sent after a full host reset and restore? Is ufshcd_probe_hba()
not enough to make UFS device fully functional?

<snip>
         } else if (ufshcd_is_link_off(hba)) {
                 ret = ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore(hba);
                 /*
                  * ufshcd_host_reset_and_restore() should have already
                  * set the link state as active
                  */
                 if (ret || !ufshcd_is_link_active(hba))
                         goto vendor_suspend;
         }

         if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) {
                 ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE);
                 if (ret)
                         goto set_old_link_state;
         }
<snip>

Thanks,

Can Guo.