linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mount: universally disallow mounting over symlinks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Jan 2020 00:54:46 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, dev@...ncontainers.org,
        containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mount: universally disallow mounting over
 symlinks

On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 12:43:24AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> I'm not sure if you have caught anything else, but we really, really should *NOT*
> consider the LAST_BIND as "maybe we should follow the result" material.  So
> at least the following is needed; could you check if anything else remains
> with that applied?
> 
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index d6c91d1e88cb..d4fbbda8a7ff 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -2656,10 +2656,7 @@ mountpoint_last(struct nameidata *nd)
>  	nd->flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(nd->last_type != LAST_NORM)) {
> -		error = handle_dots(nd, nd->last_type);
> -		if (error)
> -			return error;
> -		path.dentry = dget(nd->path.dentry);
> +		return handle_dots(nd, nd->last_type);
>  	} else {
>  		path.dentry = d_lookup(dir, &nd->last);
>  		if (!path.dentry) {

Note, BTW, that lookup_last() (aka walk_component()) does just
that - we only hit step_into() on LAST_NORM.  The same goes
for do_last().  mountpoint_last() not doing the same is _not_
intentional - it's definitely a bug.

Consider your testcase; link points to . here.  So the only
thing you could expect from trying to follow it would be
the directory 'link' lives in.  And you don't have it
when you reach the fscker via /proc/self/fd/3; what happens
instead is nd->path set to ./link (by nd_jump_link()) *AND*
step_into() called, pushing the same ./link onto stack.
It violates all kinds of assumptions made by fs/namei.c -
when pushing a symlink onto stack nd->path is expected to
contain the base directory for resolving it.

I'm fairly sure that this is the cause of at least some
of the insanity you've caught; there always could be
something else, of course, but this hole needs to be
closed in any case.