lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:46:15 +0000
From:   atmgnd <atmgnd@...tonmail.com>
To:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Fw: usbcore missing parentheses in USE_NEW_SCHEME

I think there is missing parentheses in macro USE_NEW_SCHEME, it should be:
#define USE_NEW_SCHEME(i, scheme)      ((i) / 2 == (int)(scheme))

causes a fail wiht "device descriptor read/64, error -110" using my usb drive on vmware using usb 3.0 hub.
from https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/25244227158e1502062041365a439a54cb8fe673#diff-28615d62e1250eadc353d804f49bc6d6

someone changed USE_NEW_SCHEME, but without parentheses for second parameter. as result. in fuction use_new_scheme when old_scheme_first is 1, use_new_scheme will return 1 always(actullay is should return 0). it also make https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/bd0e6c9614b95352eb31d0207df16dc156c527fa#diff-28615d62e1250eadc353d804f49bc6d6 fails.

I cannot use git send-mail, there some issue with my network provider. patch below, :


>From 85f01b89d050a988f4d9fc78232de47e793c6a7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: atmgnd <atmgnd@...look.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:27:13 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] usb: hub: missing parentheses in USE_NEW_SCHEME

accroding to bd0e6c9#diff-28615d62e1250eadc353d804f49bc6d6, will try old enumeration
scheme first for high speed devices. for example, when a high speed device pluged in,
line 2720 should expand to 0 at the first time. USE_NEW_SCHEME(0, 0 || 0 || 1) === 0.
but it wrongly expand to 1(alway expand to 1 for high speed device), and change
USE_NEW_SCHEME to USE_NEW_SCHEME((i) % 2 == (int)(scheme)) may be better ?

Signed-off-by: atmgnd <atmgnd@...look.com>
---
 drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
index f229ad6952c0..7d17deca7021 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
@@ -2692,7 +2692,7 @@ static unsigned hub_is_wusb(struct usb_hub *hub)
 #define SET_ADDRESS_TRIES 2
 #define GET_DESCRIPTOR_TRIES 2
 #define SET_CONFIG_TRIES (2 * (use_both_schemes + 1))
-#define USE_NEW_SCHEME(i, scheme) ((i) / 2 == (int)scheme)
+#define USE_NEW_SCHEME(i, scheme) ((i) / 2 == (int)(scheme))

 #define HUB_ROOT_RESET_TIME 60 /* times are in msec */
 #define HUB_SHORT_RESET_TIME 10
--
2.17.1

View attachment "0001-usb-hub-missing-parentheses-in-USE_NEW_SCHEME.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1318 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ