[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200102220600.726195922@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:07:08 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 097/171] net: nfc: nci: fix a possible sleep-in-atomic-context bug in nci_uart_tty_receive()
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit b7ac893652cafadcf669f78452329727e4e255cc ]
The kernel may sleep while holding a spinlock.
The function call path (from bottom to top) in Linux 4.19 is:
net/nfc/nci/uart.c, 349:
nci_skb_alloc in nci_uart_default_recv_buf
net/nfc/nci/uart.c, 255:
(FUNC_PTR)nci_uart_default_recv_buf in nci_uart_tty_receive
net/nfc/nci/uart.c, 254:
spin_lock in nci_uart_tty_receive
nci_skb_alloc(GFP_KERNEL) can sleep at runtime.
(FUNC_PTR) means a function pointer is called.
To fix this bug, GFP_KERNEL is replaced with GFP_ATOMIC for
nci_skb_alloc().
This bug is found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by myself.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/nfc/nci/uart.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/nfc/nci/uart.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/uart.c
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ static int nci_uart_default_recv_buf(str
nu->rx_packet_len = -1;
nu->rx_skb = nci_skb_alloc(nu->ndev,
NCI_MAX_PACKET_SIZE,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!nu->rx_skb)
return -ENOMEM;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists