[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <001401d5c1c7$2531c8d0$6f955a70$@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 08:48:34 +0900
From: "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
To: "'Greg KH'" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: 'Pali Rohár' <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<valdis.kletnieks@...edu>, <hch@....de>, <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
"'Namjae Jeon'" <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 12/13] exfat: add exfat in fs/Kconfig and fs/Makefile
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 10:07:16PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> > >> index 98be354fdb61..2c7ea7e0a95b 100644
> > >> --- a/fs/Makefile
> > >> +++ b/fs/Makefile
> > >> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS) +=
hugetlbfs/
> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_CODA_FS) += coda/
> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_MINIX_FS) += minix/
> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_FAT_FS) += fat/
> > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_EXFAT) += exfat/
> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_BFS_FS) += bfs/
> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_ISO9660_FS) += isofs/
> > >> obj-$(CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS) += hfsplus/ # Before hfs to find
wrapped
> HFS+
> > >
> > > Seems that all filesystems have _FS suffix in their config names. So
> > > should not have exfat config also same convention? CONFIG_EXFAT_FS?
> > Yeah, I know, However, That name conflicts with staging/exfat.
> > So I subtracted _FS suffix.
>
> If it's a problem, please send me a patch to rename the staging/exfat/
> config option so that you can use the "real" one someday soon.
Okay, I will:)
Thanks a lot!
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists