[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200102100125.GC8345@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:01:25 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] x86/insn-eval: Add support for 64-bit kernel mode
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:49:46PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Caller can indicate the bitness directly. It's always 32-bit for UMIP and
> get_seg_base_limit() can use insn->x86_64.
You can always send patches.
Just don't "fix" it for the sake of fixing it and the "cleanup" should
really be a cleanup not just converting it to something else. Oh, and
you need to test it too...
But you know all that. :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists