| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5792d721-cd67-5e19-dac2-1310894ef7c2@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:39:18 +0100
From: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To: James Tai <james.tai@...ltek.com>,
"linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/11] soc: Add Realtek chip info driver for RTD1195 and
RTD1295
Am 02.01.20 um 15:29 schrieb James Tai:
> Add Stanley Chang for review.
Did you forget to CC him?
Note that this series needs updates once we apply my syscon patches.
>
>> Add a soc bus driver to print chip model and revision details.
>>
>> Revisions from downstream drivers/soc/realtek/rtd{119x,129x}/rtk_chip.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
>> ---
>> Naming: What to call the family vs. soc_id?
>>
>> drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig | 13 ++++
>> drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile | 2 +
>> drivers/soc/realtek/chip.c | 164
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig create mode 100644
>> drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/soc/realtek/chip.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/Kconfig index
>> 833e04a7835c..06ae9d97321c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/Kconfig
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ source "drivers/soc/imx/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/ixp4xx/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/mediatek/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/qcom/Kconfig"
>> +source "drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/rockchip/Kconfig"
>> source "drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig"
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile index
>> 2ec355003524..1d55d838a342 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_XWAY) += lantiq/
>> obj-y += mediatek/
>> obj-y += amlogic/
>> obj-y += qcom/
>> +obj-y += realtek/
>> obj-y += renesas/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rockchip/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAMSUNG) += samsung/
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig new file
>> mode 100644 index 000000000000..be75c1889c61
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/realtek/Kconfig
>> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later if ARCH_REALTEK ||
>> +COMPILE_TEST
>> +
>> +config REALTEK_SOC
>> + tristate "Realtek chip info"
>> + default ARCH_REALTEK
>> + select SOC_BUS
>> + help
>> + Say 'y' here to enable support for SoC info on Realtek RTD1195 and
>> + RTD1295 SoC families.
>> + If unsure, say 'n'.
>> +
>> +endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile b/drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile new
>> file mode 100644 index 000000000000..49900273905b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/realtek/Makefile
>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_REALTEK_SOC) += chip.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/realtek/chip.c b/drivers/soc/realtek/chip.c new file
>> mode 100644 index 000000000000..9d13422e9936
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/realtek/chip.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>> +/*
>> + * Realtek System-on-Chip info
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2017-2019 Andreas Färber */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/sys_soc.h>
>> +
>> +#define REG_CHIP_ID 0x0
>> +#define REG_CHIP_REV 0x4
>> +
>> +struct rtd_soc_revision {
>> + const char *name;
>> + u32 chip_rev;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct rtd_soc_revision rtd1195_revisions[] = {
>> + { "A", 0x00000000 },
>> + { "B", 0x00010000 },
>> + { "C", 0x00020000 },
>> + { "D", 0x00030000 },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct rtd_soc_revision rtd1295_revisions[] = {
>> + { "A00", 0x00000000 },
>> + { "A01", 0x00010000 },
>> + { "B00", 0x00020000 },
>> + { "B01", 0x00030000 },
>> + { }
>> +};
I believe the lower 16 bits are reserved, so we should only be comparing
the upper 16.
>> +
>> +struct rtd_soc {
>> + u32 chip_id;
>> + const char *family;
>> + const char *(*get_name)(struct device *dev, const struct rtd_soc *s);
>> + const struct rtd_soc_revision *revisions;
>> + const char *codename;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const char *default_name(struct device *dev, const struct
>> +rtd_soc *s) {
>> + return s->family;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct rtd_soc rtd_soc_families[] = {
>> + { 0x00006329, "RTD1195", default_name, rtd1195_revisions, "Phoenix" },
>> + { 0x00006421, "RTD1295", default_name, rtd1295_revisions, "Kylin" },
>> +};
Similarly here I believe the upper 16 bits are reserved, so we should
only be comparing the lower 16, which should make it easier to stay
within 80 characters per line.
Regards,
Andreas
>> +
>> +static const struct rtd_soc *rtd_soc_by_chip_id(u32 chip_id) {
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rtd_soc_families); i++) {
>> + const struct rtd_soc *family = &rtd_soc_families[i];
>> +
>> + if (family->chip_id == chip_id)
>> + return family;
>> + }
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const char *rtd_soc_rev(const struct rtd_soc *family, u32
>> +chip_rev) {
>> + if (family) {
>> + const struct rtd_soc_revision *rev = family->revisions;
>> +
>> + while (rev && rev->name) {
>> + if (rev->chip_rev == chip_rev)
>> + return rev->name;
>> + rev++;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return "unknown";
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rtd_soc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>> + const struct rtd_soc *s;
>> + struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>> + struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>> + struct device_node *node;
>> + void __iomem *base;
>> + u32 chip_id, chip_rev;
>> +
>> + base = of_iomap(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
>> + if (!base)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + soc_dev_attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*soc_dev_attr), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!soc_dev_attr)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + chip_id = readl_relaxed(base + REG_CHIP_ID);
>> + chip_rev = readl_relaxed(base + REG_CHIP_REV);
>> +
>> + node = of_find_node_by_path("/");
>> + of_property_read_string(node, "model", &soc_dev_attr->machine);
>> + of_node_put(node);
>> +
>> + s = rtd_soc_by_chip_id(chip_id);
>> +
>> + soc_dev_attr->family = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "Realtek %s",
>> + (s && s->codename) ? s->codename :
>> + ((s && s->family) ? s->family : "Digital Home Center"));
>> +
>> + if (likely(s && s->get_name))
>> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = s->get_name(&pdev->dev, s);
>> + else
>> + soc_dev_attr->soc_id = "unknown";
>> +
>> + soc_dev_attr->revision = rtd_soc_rev(s, chip_rev);
>> +
>> + soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
>> + if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
>> + kfree(soc_dev_attr->family);
>> + kfree(soc_dev_attr);
>> + return PTR_ERR(soc_dev);
>> + }
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, soc_dev);
>> +
>> + dev_info(soc_device_to_device(soc_dev),
>> + "%s %s (0x%08x) rev %s (0x%08x) detected\n",
>> + soc_dev_attr->family, soc_dev_attr->soc_id, chip_id,
>> + soc_dev_attr->revision, chip_rev);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int rtd_soc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
>> + struct soc_device *soc_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> + soc_device_unregister(soc_dev);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id rtd_soc_dt_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "realtek,rtd1195-chip" },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver rtd_soc_driver = {
>> + .probe = rtd_soc_probe,
>> + .remove = rtd_soc_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "rtd1195-soc",
>> + .of_match_table = rtd_soc_dt_ids,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(rtd_soc_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Realtek SoC identification");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> --
>> 2.16.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-realtek-soc mailing list
>> linux-realtek-soc@...ts.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-realtek-soc
>>
>> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
--
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists