[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2001021018330.1546-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 10:22:49 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: atmgnd <atmgnd@...tonmail.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fw: usbcore missing parentheses in USE_NEW_SCHEME
On Wed, 1 Jan 2020, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> [adding linux-usb mailing list]
>
> On 1/1/20 6:46 AM, atmgnd wrote:
> > I think there is missing parentheses in macro USE_NEW_SCHEME, it should be:
> > #define USE_NEW_SCHEME(i, scheme) ((i) / 2 == (int)(scheme))
> >
> > causes a fail wiht "device descriptor read/64, error -110" using my usb drive on vmware using usb 3.0 hub.
> > from https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/25244227158e1502062041365a439a54cb8fe673#diff-28615d62e1250eadc353d804f49bc6d6
> >
> > someone changed USE_NEW_SCHEME, but without parentheses for second parameter. as result. in fuction use_new_scheme when old_scheme_first is 1, use_new_scheme will return 1 always(actullay is should return 0). it also make https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/bd0e6c9614b95352eb31d0207df16dc156c527fa#diff-28615d62e1250eadc353d804f49bc6d6 fails.
> >
> > I cannot use git send-mail, there some issue with my network provider. patch below, :
> >
> >
> > From 85f01b89d050a988f4d9fc78232de47e793c6a7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: atmgnd <atmgnd@...look.com>
> > Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:27:13 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] usb: hub: missing parentheses in USE_NEW_SCHEME
> >
> > accroding to bd0e6c9#diff-28615d62e1250eadc353d804f49bc6d6, will try old enumeration
> > scheme first for high speed devices. for example, when a high speed device pluged in,
> > line 2720 should expand to 0 at the first time. USE_NEW_SCHEME(0, 0 || 0 || 1) === 0.
> > but it wrongly expand to 1(alway expand to 1 for high speed device), and change
> > USE_NEW_SCHEME to USE_NEW_SCHEME((i) % 2 == (int)(scheme)) may be better ?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: atmgnd <atmgnd@...look.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > index f229ad6952c0..7d17deca7021 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
> > @@ -2692,7 +2692,7 @@ static unsigned hub_is_wusb(struct usb_hub *hub)
> > #define SET_ADDRESS_TRIES 2
> > #define GET_DESCRIPTOR_TRIES 2
> > #define SET_CONFIG_TRIES (2 * (use_both_schemes + 1))
> > -#define USE_NEW_SCHEME(i, scheme) ((i) / 2 == (int)scheme)
> > +#define USE_NEW_SCHEME(i, scheme) ((i) / 2 == (int)(scheme))
> >
> > #define HUB_ROOT_RESET_TIME 60 /* times are in msec */
> > #define HUB_SHORT_RESET_TIME 10
> > --
> > 2.17.1
atmgnd:
Please resend this patch to Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> with the appropriate CC's. Also, your
Signed-off-by: line should contain a real name, not an email userid
(you probably don't use "atmgnd" as your signature on legal
documents!).
When you resend the patch, you can include:
Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists