[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZAwaqE31=rCiub3bRZBOa68ck5Ld=A7kVsQjssps9TCxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:13:37 +0530
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
linux-amarula <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/9] dt-bindings: sun6i-dsi: Add R40 DPHY compatible
(w/ A31 fallback)
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 4:33 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 06:35:25PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > The MIPI DSI PHY controller on Allwinner R40 is similar
> > on the one on A31.
> >
> > Add R40 compatible and append A31 compatible as fallback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> > Changes for v3:
> > - update the binding in new yaml format
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml
> > index 8841938050b2..0c283fe79402 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy.yaml
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties:
> > oneOf:
> > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy
> > - items:
> > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy
> > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy
> > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy
>
> This isn't doing what you say it does.
>
> Here you're stating that there's two valid values, one that is a
> single element allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, and another which is a
> list of three elements allwinner,sun8i-r40-mipi-dphy,
> allwinner,sun50i-a64-mipi-dphy and allwinner,sun6i-a31-mipi-dphy, in
> that order.
I got it Maxime, thanks for pointing this.
>
> Did you run make dtbs_check and dt_bindings_check?
I sure I didn't, thanks for the clue.
Will do this on another patch as well.
Jagan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists