lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200102122901.6acbf857@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jan 2020 12:29:01 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Load balance aggressively for SCHED_IDLE
 CPUs

On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 10:43:30 +0530
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:

> This is tested on ARM64 Hikey620 platform (octa-core) with the help of
> rt-app and it is verified, using kernel traces, that the newly
> SCHED_IDLE CPU does load balancing shortly after it becomes SCHED_IDLE
> and pulls tasks from other busy CPUs.

Can you post the actual steps you used to test this and show the before
and after results? Then others can reproduce what you have shown and
even run other tests to see if this change has any other side effects.

Thanks!

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ