[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200102195314.GA227154@google.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 14:53:14 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix printing ptrs in preempt/irq enable/disable
events
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 03:13:01PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:47:41 -0500
> Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 09:21:15AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > >
> > > Joel,
> > >
> > > Any comments on this patch?
> >
> > Steve, it looks like this issue happens with trace-cmd not knowing what
> > _stext is. If I do cat trace_pipe , then I don't see the issue as _stext is
> > looked up correctly but the reporter of the bug is using trace-cmd. Is there
> > a way to solve this within trace-cmd? Not knowing much about trace-cmd
> > internals, I will have to defer to you on this though..
> >
> > Other than this, I need to make the offset to _stext as s32 instead of u32
> > type so that the problem of the symbol location being before _stext does not
> > cause overflow.
> >
> > Lastly, I am not super convinced that we need to store the full pointer just
> > to handle a case where the offset of the symbol might be more than +-2G from
> > _stext. Once we see such issue, then we can handle it. But right now the size
> > of the trace buffer is utilized better by just storing the offset IMHO.
> >
>
> Does this fix it for you?
I am guessing this question is for Antonio to try Steve's patch with trace-cmd.
Meanwhile I posted a patch to fix the offset issue by changing the u32 to s32.
thanks,
- Joel
>
> -- Steve
>
> diff --git a/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c b/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> index 4fd3907e..dc705dd2 100644
> --- a/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> +++ b/lib/traceevent/event-parse.c
> @@ -3595,6 +3595,45 @@ tep_find_event_by_name(struct tep_handle *tep,
> return event;
> }
>
> +static unsigned long long test_for_symbol(struct tep_handle *tep,
> + struct tep_print_arg *arg)
> +{
> + unsigned long long val = 0;
> + struct func_list *item = tep->funclist;
> + char *func;
> + int i;
> +
> + if (isdigit(arg->atom.atom[0]))
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < (int)tep->func_count; i++) {
> + unsigned long long addr;
> + const char *name;
> +
> + if (tep->func_map) {
> + addr = tep->func_map[i].addr;
> + name = tep->func_map[i].func;
> + } else if (item) {
> + addr = item->addr;
> + name = item->func;
> + item = item->next;
> + } else
> + break;
> +
> + if (strcmp(arg->atom.atom, name) == 0) {
> + val = addr;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + func = realloc(arg->atom.atom, 32);
> + if (func) {
> + snprintf(func, 32, "%lld", val);
> + arg->atom.atom = func;
> + }
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> static unsigned long long
> eval_num_arg(void *data, int size, struct tep_event *event, struct tep_print_arg *arg)
> {
> @@ -3611,7 +3650,10 @@ eval_num_arg(void *data, int size, struct tep_event *event, struct tep_print_arg
> /* ?? */
> return 0;
> case TEP_PRINT_ATOM:
> - return strtoull(arg->atom.atom, NULL, 0);
> + val = strtoull(arg->atom.atom, NULL, 0);
> + if (!val)
> + val = test_for_symbol(tep, arg);
> + return val;
> case TEP_PRINT_FIELD:
> if (!arg->field.field) {
> arg->field.field = tep_find_any_field(event, arg->field.name);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists