[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200102220547.250215374@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:05:33 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 002/171] btrfs: do not leak reloc root if we fail to read the fs root
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
commit ca1aa2818a53875cfdd175fb5e9a2984e997cce9 upstream.
If we fail to read the fs root corresponding with a reloc root we'll
just break out and free the reloc roots. But we remove our current
reloc_root from this list higher up, which means we'll leak this
reloc_root. Fix this by adding ourselves back to the reloc_roots list
so we are properly cleaned up.
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -4587,6 +4587,7 @@ int btrfs_recover_relocation(struct btrf
reloc_root->root_key.offset);
if (IS_ERR(fs_root)) {
err = PTR_ERR(fs_root);
+ list_add_tail(&reloc_root->root_list, &reloc_roots);
goto out_free;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists