linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 090/171] btrfs: return error pointer from alloc_test_extent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200102220559.585238593@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  2 Jan 2020 23:07:01 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 090/171] btrfs: return error pointer from alloc_test_extent_buffer

From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit b6293c821ea8fa2a631a2112cd86cd435effeb8b ]

Callers of alloc_test_extent_buffer have not correctly interpreted the
return value as error pointer, as alloc_test_extent_buffer should behave
as alloc_extent_buffer. The self-tests were unaffected but
btrfs_find_create_tree_block could call both functions and that would
cause problems up in the call chain.

Fixes: faa2dbf004e8 ("Btrfs: add sanity tests for new qgroup accounting code")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c                   | 6 ++++--
 fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c | 6 +++---
 fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c          | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index 4d901200be13..37a28e2369b9 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4994,12 +4994,14 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_test_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 		return eb;
 	eb = alloc_dummy_extent_buffer(fs_info, start, nodesize);
 	if (!eb)
-		return NULL;
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	eb->fs_info = fs_info;
 again:
 	ret = radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
+		exists = ERR_PTR(ret);
 		goto free_eb;
+	}
 	spin_lock(&fs_info->buffer_lock);
 	ret = radix_tree_insert(&fs_info->buffer_radix,
 				start >> PAGE_SHIFT, eb);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c
index a724d9a79bd2..5e3b875d87e2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/free-space-tree-tests.c
@@ -476,9 +476,9 @@ static int run_test(test_func_t test_func, int bitmaps, u32 sectorsize,
 
 	root->node = alloc_test_extent_buffer(root->fs_info,
 		nodesize, nodesize);
-	if (!root->node) {
-		test_msg("Couldn't allocate dummy buffer\n");
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
+	if (IS_ERR(root->node)) {
+		test_msg("couldn't allocate dummy buffer\n");
+		ret = PTR_ERR(root->node);
 		goto out;
 	}
 	btrfs_set_header_level(root->node, 0);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c
index 9c6666692341..e0aa6b9786fa 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/qgroup-tests.c
@@ -488,9 +488,9 @@ int btrfs_test_qgroups(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
 	 */
 	root->node = alloc_test_extent_buffer(root->fs_info, nodesize,
 					nodesize);
-	if (!root->node) {
+	if (IS_ERR(root->node)) {
 		test_msg("Couldn't allocate dummy buffer\n");
-		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		ret = PTR_ERR(root->node);
 		goto out;
 	}
 	btrfs_set_header_level(root->node, 0);
-- 
2.20.1