linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6, 02/14] drm/mediatek: move dsi/dpi select input into mtk_ddp_sel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1577943579.15116.1.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date:   Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:39:39 +0800
From:   Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
To:     CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
CC:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "David Airlie" <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6, 02/14] drm/mediatek: move dsi/dpi select input into
 mtk_ddp_sel_in

On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 13:03 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Yongqiang:
> 
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 12:00 +0800, Yongqiang Niu wrote:
> > move dsi/dpi select input into mtk_ddp_sel_in
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 10 ++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > index 39700b9..91c9b19 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> > @@ -376,6 +376,12 @@ static unsigned int mtk_ddp_sel_in(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> >  	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0) {
> >  		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL;
> >  		value = DSI_SEL_IN_BLS;
> > +	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0) {
> > +		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL;
> > +		value = DSI_SEL_IN_RDMA;
> 
> In original code, this is set when cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS and next ==
> DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0. Why do you change the condition?
> 
> Regards,
> CK

if bls connect with dpi0, rdma1 should connect with dsi0, the condition
is same with before.
> 
> > +	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0) {
> > +		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DPI_SEL;
> > +		value = DPI_SEL_IN_BLS;
> >  	} else {
> >  		value = 0;
> >  	}
> > @@ -393,10 +399,6 @@ static void mtk_ddp_sout_sel(struct regmap *config_regs,
> >  	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0) {
> >  		regmap_write(config_regs, DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL,
> >  				BLS_TO_DPI_RDMA1_TO_DSI);
> > -		regmap_write(config_regs, DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL,
> > -				DSI_SEL_IN_RDMA);
> > -		regmap_write(config_regs, DISP_REG_CONFIG_DPI_SEL,
> > -				DPI_SEL_IN_BLS);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> 
>