linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/91] 4.14.162-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200103083819.GC831558@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Jan 2020 09:38:19 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/91] 4.14.162-stable review

On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 07:16:39PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 03:05:18PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 11:06:42PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.162 release.
> > > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Sat, 04 Jan 2020 22:01:54 +0000.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > 
> > drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c: In function 'ioctl_event_summary':
> > drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c:901:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'?
> > 
> > The problem also affects v4.19.y. Seen with various 32-bit builds,
> > including i386:allmodconfig and arm:allmodconfig.
> > 
> > The backport replaces ioread64 with readq, which may not have been
> > such a good idea.
> 
> Indeed. I'll drop it for now, thanks!

I've pushed out -rc2 versions with this patch removed now.

thanks,

greg k-h