linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 25/55] staging: wfx: fix name of struct hif_req_start_scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Jan 2020 12:27:44 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Jérôme Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc:     "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/55] staging: wfx: fix name of struct
 hif_req_start_scan_alt

On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 05:03:46PM +0000, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> 
> The original name did not make any sense.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h
> index 3e77fbe3d5ff..4ce3bb51cf04 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_api_cmd.h
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ struct hif_req_start_scan {
>  	u8    ssid_and_channel_lists[];
>  } __packed;
>  
> -struct hif_start_scan_req_cstnbssid_body {
> +struct hif_req_start_scan_alt {
>  	u8    band;
>  	struct hif_scan_type scan_type;
>  	struct hif_scan_flags scan_flags;

Why not just delete this if it isn't used?

regards,
dan carpenter