[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1578060937.5874.140.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 09:15:37 -0500
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eric.snowberg@...cle.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, matthewgarrett@...gle.com,
sashal@...nel.org, jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] IMA: Define workqueue for early boot key
measurements
Hi Lakshmi,
On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:56 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Measuring keys requires a custom IMA policy to be loaded.
> Keys created or updated before a custom IMA policy is loaded should
> be queued and the keys should be processed after a custom policy
> is loaded.
>
> This patch defines workqueue for queuing keys when a custom IMA policy
> has not yet been loaded.
>
> A flag namely ima_process_keys is used to check if the key should be
> queued or should be processed immediately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
The changes based on "kernel test robot" reports are properly folded
into this patch, but unless the tag - "Acked-by", "Reported-by" - is
qualified, it refers to the entire patch. Let's limit it as:
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com> # sleeping
function called from invalid context
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> # sparse symbol
ima_queued_key() should be static
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists