linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] docs: ftrace: Fix minor issues in the doc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:48:28 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     "Frank A. Cancio Bello" <frank@...eralsoftwareinc.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org,
        nachukannan@...il.com, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] docs: ftrace: Fix minor issues in the doc

On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 19:05:38 -0500
"Frank A. Cancio Bello" <frank@...eralsoftwareinc.com> wrote:

> I didn't want to be pushy with these minor fixes but occur to me
> now that, even all seem to be clear in the latest version of the
> RFC (v2) related to these fixes, a clean patchset could be expected
> after such RFC. So here we go:
> 
> Clarifies the RAM footprint of buffer_size_kb without getting into
> implementation details.
> 
> Fix typos and a small notation mistakes in the doc.
> 

Jon,

Can you take these in your tree?

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>

Thanks!

-- Steve