linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 1/8] PCI/ERR: Update error status after reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200104025414.GA85401@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 3 Jan 2020 20:54:14 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ashok.raj@...el.com, keith.busch@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/8] PCI/ERR: Update error status after reset_link()

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 05:03:03PM -0800, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> On 1/3/20 4:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 04:39:07PM -0800, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Commit bdb5ac85777d ("PCI/ERR: Handle fatal error recovery") uses
> > > reset_link() to recover from fatal errors. But, if the reset is
> > > successful there is no need to continue the rest of the error recovery
> > > checks. Also, during fatal error recovery, if the initial value of error
> > > status is PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT or PCI_ERS_RESULT_NO_AER_DRIVER then
> > > even after successful recovery (using reset_link()) pcie_do_recovery()
> > > will report the recovery result as failure. So update the status of
> > > error after reset_link().
> > I like the part about updating "status" with the result of
> > reset_link(), and I split that into its own patch because it
> > seems like a fix that *can* be separated.
> > 
> > But I'm not convinced that we should skip the ->slot_reset()
> > callbacks if the reset_link() was successful.
>
> If reset_link() call is successful then the result value will be
> "PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED". So even if you proceed with
> rest of the code, slot_reset() will never get called right ?

The current code:

        if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen &&
            reset_link(dev, service) != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
                goto failed;
        ...
        if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) {
                status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
                pci_walk_bus(bus, report_slot_reset, &status);

doesn't save the result of reset_link(), so if status was
PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET and the reset succeeds, we will call
->slot_reset().

After your patch, if "state == pci_channel_io_frozen", we *never* call
->slot_reset().

Do you think that matches pci-error-recovery.rst?  It doesn't seem
like it to me, but perhaps I haven't read it closely enough.

> > According to
> > Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst, we should call
> > ->slot_reset() after completion of the reset.
> > 
> > For example, rsxx_err_handler implements ->slot_reset(), but
> > not ->resume().  If we reset the device, we'll claim success and
> > return, but we won't call rsxx_slot_reset(), which does a bunch
> > of important-looking recovery stuff.
> > 
> > If pci-error-recovery.rst is wrong, we should fix that (after
> > auditing all the drivers to make sure they match).
> > 
> > > Fixes: bdb5ac85777d ("PCI/ERR: Handle fatal error recovery")
> > > Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
> > > Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 10 +++++++---
> > >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> > > index b0e6048a9208..53cd9200ec2c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> > > @@ -204,9 +204,12 @@ void pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_channel_state state,
> > >   	else
> > >   		pci_walk_bus(bus, report_normal_detected, &status);
> > > -	if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen &&
> > > -	    reset_link(dev, service) != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
> > > -		goto failed;
> > > +	if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
> > > +		status = reset_link(dev, service);
> > > +		if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
> > > +			goto failed;
> > > +		goto done;
> > > +	}
> > >   	if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER) {
> > >   		status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
> > > @@ -228,6 +231,7 @@ void pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_channel_state state,
> > >   	if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
> > >   		goto failed;
> > > +done:
> > >   	pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast resume message\n");
> > >   	pci_walk_bus(bus, report_resume, &status);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.21.0
> > > 
> -- 
> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
> Linux kernel developer
>