[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200105.142531.1912385676087452153.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 14:25:31 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alobakin@...nk.ru,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, hauke@...ke-m.de,
woojung.huh@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
sean.wang@...iatek.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
vladimir.oltean@....com, claudiu.manoil@....com, sdf@...gle.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, songliubraving@...com, ppenkov@...gle.com,
mcroce@...hat.com, jakub@...udflare.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
paulb@...lanox.com, komachi.yoshiki@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: Remove indirect function call for
flow dissection
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:36:53 -0800
> We only need "static" information to be given for DSA flow dissection,
> so replace the expensive call to .flow_dissect() with an integer giving
> us the offset into the packet array of bytes that we must de-reference
> to obtain the protocol number. The overhead was alreayd available from
> the dsa_device_ops structure so use that directly.
>
> The presence of a flow_dissect callback used to indicate that the DSA
> tagger supported returning that information,we now encode this with a
> proto_off value of DSA_PROTO_OFF_UNPSEC if the tagger does not support
> providing that information yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
>
> - use a constant instead of the "magic" -1
> - update all tag drivers and build test correctly
At the very least the typos need to be fixed, so marking this changes
requested in patchwork just FYI...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists