linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 10/16] usb: phy: tegra: Use device-tree notion of reset-GPIO's active-state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 5 Jan 2020 03:58:39 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Peter Chen <Peter.Chen@....com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/16] usb: phy: tegra: Use device-tree notion of
 reset-GPIO's active-state

04.01.2020 02:53, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 03.01.2020 10:58, Michał Mirosław пишет:
[snip]
>> [...]
>>> -		err = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, tegra_phy->reset_gpio,
>>> -					"ulpi_phy_reset_b");
>>> +		gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_from_of_node(&pdev->dev, np,
>>> +						    "nvidia,phy-reset-gpio",
>>> +						    0, GPIOD_OUT_HIGH,
>>> +						    "ulpi_phy_reset_b");
>>> +		err = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(gpiod);
>>>  		if (err) {
>>> -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Request failed for GPIO %d: %d\n",
>>> -				tegra_phy->reset_gpio, err);
>>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>>> +				"Request failed for reset GPIO: %d\n", err);
>>>  			return err;
>>>  		}
>>> +		tegra_phy->reset_gpio = gpiod;
>>
>> A nice extension to kernel's printf - "%pe" format - has just landed in
>> Linus' master tree.
> 
> Thank you very much, I didn't know about that.

In this particular case PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() results in a bit more cleaner
code than with IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() [IMHO], so I'll probably keep it
as-is. Anyways, thanks again for the pointer to "%pe", it could come
handy later on.