[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200106024515.GA1021@andestech.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:45:16 +0800
From: Alan Kao <alankao@...estech.com>
To: <guoren@...nel.org>
CC: <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <Anup.Patel@....com>,
<vincent.chen@...ive.com>, <zong.li@...ive.com>,
<greentime.hu@...ive.com>, <bmeng.cn@...il.com>,
<atish.patra@....com>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>, Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] riscv: Add vector ISA support
Hi Guo,
On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 10:52:15AM +0800, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>
>
> The implementation follow the RISC-V "V" Vector Extension draft v0.8 with
> 128bit-vlen and it's based on linux-5.5-rc4.
>
According to https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/22/2169, in which Paul has stated
that "we plan to only accept patches for new modules or extensions that have
been frozen or ratified by the RISC-V Foundation."
Is v0.8 ratified enough for now?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists