linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: document optional bus recovery properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f7c19f6-014e-d207-d3ab-bb439e1847f8@microchip.com>
Date:   Mon, 6 Jan 2020 16:34:51 +0000
From:   <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
To:     <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>,
        <wsa@...-dreams.de>, <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>,
        <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, <Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: i2c: at91: document optional bus
 recovery properties

On 04.01.2020 00:29, Rob Herring wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 09:49:06 +0000, <Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>
>>
>> The at91 I2C controller can support bus recovery by re-assigning SCL
>> and SDA to gpios. Add the optional pinctrl and gpio properties to do
>> so.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kamel Bouhara <kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>>   - none
>>
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-at91.txt | 10 ++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 

Sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Acked-by. There is nothing changed in 
this version. How should I proceed, should I resend it with your tag?

Best regards,
Codrin