lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee2cb1d7a6c1b51e1c8277a8feaafe6d@natalenko.name>
Date:   Mon, 06 Jan 2020 19:40:55 +0100
From:   Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Multidevice f2fs mount after disk rearrangement

Hi.

On 06.01.2020 19:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Thank you for investigating this ahead of me. :) Yes, the device list 
> is stored
> in superblock, so hacking it manually should work.
> 
> Let me think about a tool to tune that.

Thank you both for the replies.

IIUC, tune.f2fs is not there yet. I saw a submission, but I do not see 
it as accepted, right?

Having this in tune.f2fs would be fine (assuming the assertion is 
replaced with some meaningful hint message), but wouldn't it be more 
convenient for an ordinary user to have implemented something like:

# mount -t f2fs /dev/sdb -o nextdev=/dev/sdc /mnt/fs

Hm?

-- 
   Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ