[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200106200802.26994-2-sj38.park@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 21:07:56 +0100
From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: corbet@....net, madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] doc/RCU/Design: Remove remaining HTML tags in ReST files
From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Commit ccc9971e2147 ("docs: rcu: convert some articles from html to
ReST") has converted a few of html RCU docs into ReST files, but a few
of html tags which not supported on rst is remaining. This commit
converts those to ReST appropriate alternatives.
Reviewed-by: Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
---
.../Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
index 1a8b129cfc04..83ae3b79a643 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.rst
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ A Tour Through TREE_RCU's Grace-Period Memory Ordering
August 8, 2017
-This article was contributed by Paul E. McKenney
+This article was contributed by Paul E. McKenney
Introduction
============
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Tree RCU Grace Period Memory Ordering Building Blocks
The workhorse for RCU's grace-period memory ordering is the
critical section for the ``rcu_node`` structure's
-``->lock``. These critical sections use helper functions for lock
+``->lock``. These critical sections use helper functions for lock
acquisition, including ``raw_spin_lock_rcu_node()``,
``raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node()``, and ``raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node()``.
Their lock-release counterparts are ``raw_spin_unlock_rcu_node()``,
@@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ lock-acquisition and lock-release functions::
23 r3 = READ_ONCE(x);
24 }
25
- 26 WARN_ON(r1 == 0 && r2 == 0 && r3 == 0);
+ 26 WARN_ON(r1 == 0 && r2 == 0 && r3 == 0);
-The ``WARN_ON()`` is evaluated at “the end of time”,
+The ``WARN_ON()`` is evaluated at "the end of time",
after all changes have propagated throughout the system.
Without the ``smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()`` provided by the
acquisition functions, this ``WARN_ON()`` could trigger, for example
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists