[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200106214534.39378927@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 21:45:34 +0100
From: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@....net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Annaliese McDermond <nh6z@...z.net>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ASoC: tlv320aic32x4: handle regmap_read error
gracefully
Hello Mark,
On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 22:52:04 +0000, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 04:20:56PM +0100, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> > Fixes:
> >
> > [ 5.169310] Division by zero in kernel.
> > [ 5.200998] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.3.18-20191021-1+ #14
> > [ 5.203049] cdc_acm 2-1.6:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device
> > [ 5.208198] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
> > [ 5.220084] Backtrace:
> > [ 5.222628] [<8010f60c>] (dump_backtrace) from [<8010f9a8>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24)
>
> Please think hard before including complete backtraces in upstream
> reports, they are very large and contain almost no useful information
> relative to their size so often obscure the relevant content in your
> message. If part of the backtrace is usefully illustrative then it's
> usually better to pull out the relevant sections.
Thanks for review..., but a little disagree here, do not know much which
is more informative than a complete back trace for a division by zero (and
which is the complete information/starting point for investigating the
reason therefore) and it would be a pity to loose this valuable information?
Maybe I should have added more information about why and how the failing
regmap_read() call leads to a division by zero?
Any hint for a better commit message is welcome ;-)
Regards,
Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists