[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200106213505.GW11244@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 21:35:05 +0000
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Dave Olsthoorn <dave@...aar.me>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/10] efi/firmware/platform-x86: Add EFI embedded fw
support
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 12:36:04PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 at 12:27, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Since I send this out, efi-next has seen some changes causing the first
> > 2 patches to no longer cleanly apply. So it looks like we need to
> > merge this one bit at a time with immutable branches.
> >
> > Ard, the first 2 patches in this series should be merged through your
> > efi tree. AFAIK everyone is happy with them in their current state
> > so they are ready for merging. Can you create an immutable branch
> > with these 2 patches and merge that into your efi-next branch?
> >
> > Note if you do the immutable branch on 5.5-rc1 + just these 2 patches,
> > there will be a conflict when you merge this into efi-next, but it is
> > trivial to resolve.
> >
>
> I will need to defer to Ingo here, as he usually applies the EFI
> changes piecemeal rather than merging my branches directly.
>
> I'd be fine with just annotating the conflict in the pull request if
> it is trivial, though, but it is really up to Luis and Ingo to align
> here.
I don't have a tree, and firmware goes Greg's driver core tree so
actually its up to Greg and Ingo on how this gets merged. But it seems
you just have one issue to fix:
[PATCH v10 05/10] test_firmware: add support for firmware_request_platform
There is a few set of empty lines added and I had one comment on the
release of the firmware.
Other than this, I agree this seems ready to be merged.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists