linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 022/191] rxe: correctly calculate iCRC for unaligned payloads

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200107205334.190976846@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  7 Jan 2020 21:52:22 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Steve Wise <larrystevenwise@...il.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 022/191] rxe: correctly calculate iCRC for unaligned payloads

From: Steve Wise <larrystevenwise@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 2030abddec6884aaf5892f5724c48fc340e6826f ]

If RoCE PDUs being sent or received contain pad bytes, then the iCRC
is miscalculated, resulting in PDUs being emitted by RXE with an incorrect
iCRC, as well as ingress PDUs being dropped due to erroneously detecting
a bad iCRC in the PDU.  The fix is to include the pad bytes, if any,
in iCRC computations.

Note: This bug has caused broken on-the-wire compatibility with actual
hardware RoCE devices since the soft-RoCE driver was first put into the
mainstream kernel.  Fixing it will create an incompatibility with the
original soft-RoCE devices, but is necessary to be compatible with real
hardware devices.

Fixes: 8700e3e7c485 ("Soft RoCE driver")
Signed-off-by: Steve Wise <larrystevenwise@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191203020319.15036-2-larrystevenwise@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_recv.c | 2 +-
 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c  | 6 ++++++
 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c | 7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_recv.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_recv.c
index f9a492ed900b..831ad578a7b2 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_recv.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_recv.c
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ void rxe_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
 
 	calc_icrc = rxe_icrc_hdr(pkt, skb);
 	calc_icrc = rxe_crc32(rxe, calc_icrc, (u8 *)payload_addr(pkt),
-			      payload_size(pkt));
+			      payload_size(pkt) + bth_pad(pkt));
 	calc_icrc = (__force u32)cpu_to_be32(~calc_icrc);
 	if (unlikely(calc_icrc != pack_icrc)) {
 		if (skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IPV6))
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
index c5d9b558fa90..e5031172c019 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
@@ -500,6 +500,12 @@ static int fill_packet(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe,
 			if (err)
 				return err;
 		}
+		if (bth_pad(pkt)) {
+			u8 *pad = payload_addr(pkt) + paylen;
+
+			memset(pad, 0, bth_pad(pkt));
+			crc = rxe_crc32(rxe, crc, pad, bth_pad(pkt));
+		}
 	}
 	p = payload_addr(pkt) + paylen + bth_pad(pkt);
 
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
index 1cbfbd98eb22..c4a8195bf670 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
@@ -732,6 +732,13 @@ static enum resp_states read_reply(struct rxe_qp *qp,
 	if (err)
 		pr_err("Failed copying memory\n");
 
+	if (bth_pad(&ack_pkt)) {
+		struct rxe_dev *rxe = to_rdev(qp->ibqp.device);
+		u8 *pad = payload_addr(&ack_pkt) + payload;
+
+		memset(pad, 0, bth_pad(&ack_pkt));
+		icrc = rxe_crc32(rxe, icrc, pad, bth_pad(&ack_pkt));
+	}
 	p = payload_addr(&ack_pkt) + payload + bth_pad(&ack_pkt);
 	*p = ~icrc;
 
-- 
2.20.1