[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANgfPd-GLFtqrWsyg6hvrMFYxWCzxAQEGZ9Ahk4ZATYWs0_VaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:13:12 -0800
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: selftests: Add demand paging content to the
demand paging test
Done. I'll have it in the next version of the patch set I send out.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 8:00 AM Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:38:55PM -0800, Ben Gardon wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > +static void *uffd_handler_thread_fn(void *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct uffd_handler_args *uffd_args = (struct uffd_handler_args *)arg;
> > + int uffd = uffd_args->uffd;
> > + int64_t pages = 0;
> > +
> > + while (!quit_uffd_thread) {
> > + struct uffd_msg msg;
> > + struct pollfd pollfd[1];
> > + int r;
> > + uint64_t addr;
> > +
> > + pollfd[0].fd = uffd;
> > + pollfd[0].events = POLLIN;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * TODO this introduces a 0.5sec delay at the end of the test.
> > + * Reduce the timeout or eliminate it following the example in
> > + * tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
> > + */
> > + r = poll(pollfd, 1, 500);
>
> Would you mind implement it instead of adding a todo? IIUC it's as
> simple as a few more lines than the comment itself. Thanks,
>
> --
> Peter Xu
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists