linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 082/191] media: cec: check transmit_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200107205337.370595839@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  7 Jan 2020 21:53:22 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 082/191] media: cec: check transmit_in_progress, not transmitting

From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>

commit ac479b51f3f4aaa852b5d3f00ecfb9290230cf64 upstream.

Currently wait_event_interruptible_timeout is called in cec_thread_func()
when adap->transmitting is set. But if the adapter is unconfigured
while transmitting, then adap->transmitting is set to NULL. But the
hardware is still actually transmitting the message, and that's
indicated by adap->transmit_in_progress and we should wait until that
is finished or times out before transmitting new messages.

As the original commit says: adap->transmitting is the userspace view,
adap->transmit_in_progress reflects the hardware state.

However, if adap->transmitting is NULL and adap->transmit_in_progress
is true, then wait_event_interruptible is called (no timeout), which
can get stuck indefinitely if the CEC driver is flaky and never marks
the transmit-in-progress as 'done'.

So test against transmit_in_progress when deciding whether to use
the timeout variant or not, instead of testing against adap->transmitting.

Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
Fixes: 32804fcb612b ("media: cec: keep track of outstanding transmits")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>      # for v4.19 and up
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c |   20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
+++ b/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ int cec_thread_func(void *_adap)
 		bool timeout = false;
 		u8 attempts;
 
-		if (adap->transmitting) {
+		if (adap->transmit_in_progress) {
 			int err;
 
 			/*
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int cec_thread_func(void *_adap)
 			goto unlock;
 		}
 
-		if (adap->transmitting && timeout) {
+		if (adap->transmit_in_progress && timeout) {
 			/*
 			 * If we timeout, then log that. Normally this does
 			 * not happen and it is an indication of a faulty CEC
@@ -507,14 +507,18 @@ int cec_thread_func(void *_adap)
 			 * so much traffic on the bus that the adapter was
 			 * unable to transmit for CEC_XFER_TIMEOUT_MS (2.1s).
 			 */
-			pr_warn("cec-%s: message %*ph timed out\n", adap->name,
-				adap->transmitting->msg.len,
-				adap->transmitting->msg.msg);
+			if (adap->transmitting) {
+				pr_warn("cec-%s: message %*ph timed out\n", adap->name,
+					adap->transmitting->msg.len,
+					adap->transmitting->msg.msg);
+				/* Just give up on this. */
+				cec_data_cancel(adap->transmitting,
+						CEC_TX_STATUS_TIMEOUT);
+			} else {
+				pr_warn("cec-%s: transmit timed out\n", adap->name);
+			}
 			adap->transmit_in_progress = false;
 			adap->tx_timeouts++;
-			/* Just give up on this. */
-			cec_data_cancel(adap->transmitting,
-					CEC_TX_STATUS_TIMEOUT);
 			goto unlock;
 		}