[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E9DF932-C46C-4331-B88D-6928D63B8267@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 21:37:25 +0000
From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
CC: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] tmpfs: Support 64-bit inums per-sb
On 7 Jan 2020, at 16:07, Dave Chinner wrote:
> IOWs, there are *lots* of 64bit inode numbers out there on XFS
> filesystems....
It's less likely in btrfs but +1 to all of Dave's comments. I'm happy
to run a scan on machines in the fleet and see how many have 64 bit
inodes (either buttery or x-y), but it's going to be a lot.
-chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists