[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200107214834.GB738324@yoga>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:48:34 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
leonard.crestez@....com, lukasz.luba@....com, a.swigon@...sung.com,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, enric.balletbo@...labora.com,
hl@...k-chips.com, digetx@...il.com, jcrouse@...eaurora.org,
chanwoo@...nel.org, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PM / devfreq: Add devfreq_transitions debugfs file
On Tue 07 Jan 01:05 PST 2020, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Add new devfreq_transitions debugfs file to track the frequency transitions
> of all devfreq devices for the simple profiling as following:
> - /sys/kernel/debug/devfreq/devfreq_transitions
>
> And the user can decide the storage size (CONFIG_NR_DEVFREQ_TRANSITIONS)
> in Kconfig in order to save the transition history.
>
> [Detailed description of each field of 'devfreq_transitions' debugfs file]
> - time_ms : Change time of frequency transition. (unit: millisecond)
> - dev_name : Device name of h/w.
> - dev : Device name made by devfreq core.
> - parent_dev : If devfreq device uses the passive governor,
> show parent devfreq device name.
> - load_% : If devfreq device uses the simple_ondemand governor,
> load is used by governor whene deciding the new frequency.
> (unit: percentage)
> - old_freq_hz : Frequency before changing. (unit: hz)
> - new_freq_hz : Frequency after changed. (unit: hz)
>
> [For example on Exynos5422-based Odroid-XU3 board]
> $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/devfreq/devfreq_transitions
> time_ms dev_name dev parent_dev load_% old_freq_hz new_freq_hz
> ---------- ------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------ ------------
> 14600 soc:bus_noc devfreq2 devfreq1 0 100000000 67000000
> 14600 soc:bus_fsys_apb devfreq3 devfreq1 0 200000000 100000000
> 14600 soc:bus_fsys devfreq4 devfreq1 0 200000000 100000000
> 14600 soc:bus_fsys2 devfreq5 devfreq1 0 150000000 75000000
> 14602 soc:bus_mfc devfreq6 devfreq1 0 222000000 96000000
> 14602 soc:bus_gen devfreq7 devfreq1 0 267000000 89000000
> 14602 soc:bus_g2d devfreq9 devfreq1 0 300000000 84000000
> 14602 soc:bus_g2d_acp devfreq10 devfreq1 0 267000000 67000000
> 14602 soc:bus_jpeg devfreq11 devfreq1 0 300000000 75000000
> 14602 soc:bus_jpeg_apb devfreq12 devfreq1 0 167000000 84000000
> 14603 soc:bus_disp1_fimd devfreq13 devfreq1 0 200000000 120000000
> 14603 soc:bus_disp1 devfreq14 devfreq1 0 300000000 120000000
> 14606 soc:bus_gscl_scaler devfreq15 devfreq1 0 300000000 150000000
> 14606 soc:bus_mscl devfreq16 devfreq1 0 333000000 84000000
> 14608 soc:bus_wcore devfreq1 9 333000000 84000000
> 14783 10c20000.memory-controller devfreq0 35 825000000 633000000
> 15873 soc:bus_wcore devfreq1 41 84000000 400000000
> 15873 soc:bus_noc devfreq2 devfreq1 0 67000000 100000000
> [snip]
>
Wouldn't it make more sense to expose this through the tracing
framework - like many other subsystems does?
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists