linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: exynos: tiny4412: add proper panel node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200107090449.GA32007@pi3>
Date:   Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:04:49 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, kgene@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: exynos: tiny4412: add proper panel node

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 07:10:03PM +0000, Yangtao Li wrote:
> This patch add at070tn92 panel for tiny4412 board.

Please fix description as in patch 1.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-tiny4412.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-tiny4412.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-tiny4412.dts
> index 2b62cb27420c..57f9d09233ad 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-tiny4412.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-tiny4412.dts
> @@ -66,6 +66,16 @@
>  			clock-frequency = <24000000>;
>  		};
>  	};
> +
> +	panel {
> +		compatible = "innolux,at070tn92";
> +
> +		port {
> +			panel_input: endpoint {
> +				remote-endpoint = <&lcdc_output>;
> +			};
> +		};
> +	};
>  };
>  
>  &fimd {
> @@ -74,6 +84,12 @@
>  	#address-cells = <1>;
>  	#size-cells = <0>;
>  	status = "okay";

One empty space here.

> +	port@3 {
> +		reg = <3>;

Why starting from "3"? Why this is port@3, not just "port"?

Best regards,
Krzysztof