linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Make trampolines W^X

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:11:32 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Justin Capella <justincapella@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...omium.org>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
        Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...omium.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
        Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Make trampolines W^X

On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 02:13:18PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 10:33:54AM +0900, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > 
> > >> On Jan 4, 2020, at 8:03 PM, Justin Capella <justincapella@...il.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'm rather ignorant about this topic but it would make sense to check prior to making executable from a security standpoint wouldn't it? (In support of the (set_memory_ro + set_memory_x)
> > > 
> > 
> > Maybe, depends if it’s structured in a way that’s actually helpful from a security perspective.
> > 
> > It doesn’t help that set_memory_x and friends are not optimized at all. These functions are very, very, very slow and adversely affect all CPUs.
> 
> That was one of the reason it wasn't done in the first.
> Also ftrace trampoline break w^x as well.

Didn't I fix that?