[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZbehdStd2O_MKFLTWjfPaqCyM+Nimr16ZN9-UQOd+peA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:02:54 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] gpiolib: have a single place of calling set_config()
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 1:07 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>
> Instead of calling the gpiochip's set_config() callback directly and
> checking its existence every time - just add a new routine that performs
> this check internally. Call it in gpio_set_config() and
> gpiod_set_transitory(). Also call it in gpiod_set_debounce() and drop
> the check for chip->set() as it's irrelevant to this config option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists